Review methodology
How we judge a platform — and just as importantly, what we refuse to fake.
The criteria
| Criterion | What we look for |
|---|---|
| Billing transparency | Current pricing visible on the platform; no hidden charges; clear token value. |
| The free experience | You can sample the platform without a card or a hard sell. |
| Safety & privacy | Discreet billing descriptors, account security, transparent data handling. |
| Consent & performer treatment | Verified-adult performers, working report/block tools, fair-payout reputation. |
| Catalogue fit | Enough live choice in the categories and at the hours you’ll actually use. |
Why no star scores
A single number is the easiest thing to fake and the least useful thing to read. We’d rather give you the checklist than reverse-engineer a “9.2/10” to justify a placement. If we ever publish a scored comparison, it will be measured against the criteria above, clearly dated, and labelled where it’s sponsored.
How the “editor’s pick” works
When we point readers to a specific cam platform, it’s a sponsored link and we label it as such. We only feature a pick we can describe with claims that are true of it — for example, “free to watch” and “no account needed to browse.” We never dress a paid placement up as an objective ranking. See the affiliate disclosure.
Verify anything yourself
Our cam-site reviews page turns these criteria into a five-step checklist you can run on any platform in a couple of minutes.